You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Ambiguity in guideline definitions introduces assessor bias and influences consistency in IUCN Red List status assessments
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00087 |
| Authors |
Matt W. Hayward, Matthew F. Child, Graham I. H. Kerley, Peter A. Lindsey, Michael J. Somers, Bruce Burns |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 14% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 7% |
| Israel | 1 | 7% |
| Argentina | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| South Africa | 1 | 7% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 80 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 16 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 12 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 11 | 13% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 16 | 19% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 31 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 25 | 29% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 2 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 35. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2018.
All research outputs
#1,082,207
of 24,602,766 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#374
of 4,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,708
of 268,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#4
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,602,766 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,970 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,389 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.