↓ Skip to main content

Small genomes and the difficulty to define minimal translation and metabolic machineries

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (78th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
17 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Small genomes and the difficulty to define minimal translation and metabolic machineries
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2015
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2015.00123
Authors

Rosario Gil, Juli Peretó

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 4%
Spain 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 44 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 25%
Student > Bachelor 10 21%
Researcher 6 13%
Student > Master 5 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 9 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 40%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 17%
Computer Science 3 6%
Philosophy 2 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 10 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,571,353
of 24,133,587 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#904
of 4,773 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,977
of 289,512 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#8
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,133,587 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,773 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,512 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.