You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A Conserved Odorant Receptor Detects the Same 1-Indanone Analogs in a Tortricid and a Noctuid Moth
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, November 2015
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2015.00131 |
| Authors |
Francisco Gonzalez, Jonas M. Bengtsson, William B. Walker, Maria F. R. Sousa, Alberto M. Cattaneo, Nicolas Montagné, Arthur de Fouchier, Gianfranco Anfora, Emmanuelle Jacquin-Joly, Peter Witzgall, Rickard Ignell, Marie Bengtsson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Sweden | 3 | 30% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 20% |
| Canada | 2 | 20% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 9 | 90% |
| Scientists | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 31 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 29 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 19% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 6% |
| Professor | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 35% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 13 | 42% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 6% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 3% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 14 | 45% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2015.
All research outputs
#4,641,735
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,371
of 4,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,902
of 389,209 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#15
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,353 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 389,209 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its contemporaries.