You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Never Ending Analysis of a Century Old Evolutionary Debate: “Unringing” the Urmetazoon Bell
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2016
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2016.00005 |
| Authors |
Bernd Schierwater, Peter W. H. Holland, David J. Miller, Peter F. Stadler, Brian M. Wiegmann, Gert Wörheide, Gregory A. Wray, Rob DeSalle |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 29% |
| Germany | 2 | 29% |
| Unknown | 1 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Scientists | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Brazil | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 37 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 30% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 15% |
| Unknown | 5 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 16 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 28% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 10% |
| Chemistry | 1 | 3% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2017.
All research outputs
#4,857,953
of 24,078,959 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,424
of 4,759 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,302
of 405,162 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#25
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,078,959 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,759 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 405,162 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.