↓ Skip to main content

Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major)

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
17 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major)
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2017
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2017.00079
Authors

Clotilde Biard, François Brischoux, Alizée Meillère, Bruno Michaud, Manon Nivière, Stéphanie Ruault, Marie Vaugoyeau, Frédéric Angelier

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 173 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 21%
Student > Master 30 17%
Researcher 27 16%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 9 5%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 33 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 86 50%
Environmental Science 31 18%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 3%
Social Sciences 2 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 <1%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 40 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,772,191
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#619
of 4,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,552
of 317,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.