You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Growing in Cities: An Urban Penalty for Wild Birds? A Study of Phenotypic Differences between Urban and Rural Great Tit Chicks (Parus major)
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2017
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2017.00079 |
Authors |
Clotilde Biard, François Brischoux, Alizée Meillère, Bruno Michaud, Manon Nivière, Stéphanie Ruault, Marie Vaugoyeau, Frédéric Angelier |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 17 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 4 | 24% |
United States | 3 | 18% |
Australia | 2 | 12% |
Spain | 1 | 6% |
Germany | 1 | 6% |
Ecuador | 1 | 6% |
Switzerland | 1 | 6% |
South Africa | 1 | 6% |
Unknown | 3 | 18% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 10 | 59% |
Members of the public | 7 | 41% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 173 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 21% |
Student > Master | 30 | 17% |
Researcher | 27 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 17 | 10% |
Professor > Associate Professor | 9 | 5% |
Other | 20 | 12% |
Unknown | 33 | 19% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 86 | 50% |
Environmental Science | 31 | 18% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 3% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
Other | 8 | 5% |
Unknown | 40 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 June 2022.
All research outputs
#1,772,191
of 23,862,416 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#619
of 4,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,552
of 317,382 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#10
of 44 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,862,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,382 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 44 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.