You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Our House Is Burning: Discrepancy in Climate Change vs. Biodiversity Coverage in the Media as Compared to Scientific Literature
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2018
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2017.00175 |
| Authors |
Pierre Legagneux, Nicolas Casajus, Kevin Cazelles, Clément Chevallier, Marion Chevrinais, Lorelei Guéry, Claire Jacquet, Mikael Jaffré, Marie-José Naud, Fanny Noisette, Pascale Ropars, Steve Vissault, Philippe Archambault, Joel Bêty, Dominique Berteaux, Dominique Gravel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 579 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 71 | 12% |
| United States | 62 | 11% |
| Canada | 28 | 5% |
| Germany | 19 | 3% |
| Spain | 17 | 3% |
| France | 16 | 3% |
| Australia | 15 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 10 | 2% |
| Sweden | 10 | 2% |
| Other | 93 | 16% |
| Unknown | 238 | 41% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 439 | 76% |
| Scientists | 114 | 20% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 19 | 3% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 414 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 414 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 17% |
| Researcher | 67 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 56 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 43 | 10% |
| Other | 24 | 6% |
| Other | 62 | 15% |
| Unknown | 90 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 106 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 103 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 28 | 7% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 13 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 7 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 10% |
| Unknown | 115 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 567. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 March 2024.
All research outputs
#42,699
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#12
of 5,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#980
of 453,926 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1
of 43 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,926 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 43 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.