You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Wild Bee Pollen Diets Reveal Patterns of Seasonal Foraging Resources for Honey Bees
|
---|---|
Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, December 2018
|
DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2018.00210 |
Authors |
Thomas James Wood, Ian Kaplan, Zsofia Szendrei |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 43 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 17 | 40% |
United Kingdom | 5 | 12% |
Canada | 3 | 7% |
Denmark | 2 | 5% |
Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
Ireland | 1 | 2% |
Netherlands | 1 | 2% |
Poland | 1 | 2% |
Unknown | 12 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 28 | 65% |
Scientists | 13 | 30% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 139 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 139 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 24% |
Student > Master | 17 | 12% |
Researcher | 16 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 8% |
Professor | 4 | 3% |
Other | 15 | 11% |
Unknown | 42 | 30% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 59 | 42% |
Environmental Science | 16 | 12% |
Engineering | 5 | 4% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 2% |
Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | <1% |
Other | 10 | 7% |
Unknown | 45 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2018.
All research outputs
#1,491,382
of 25,192,722 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#519
of 5,175 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,598
of 449,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#14
of 75 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,192,722 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,175 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,315 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 75 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.