↓ Skip to main content

Do Big Unstructured Biodiversity Data Mean More Knowledge?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
124 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
102 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
234 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Do Big Unstructured Biodiversity Data Mean More Knowledge?
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2019
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2018.00239
Authors

Elisa Bayraktarov, Glenn Ehmke, James O'Connor, Emma L. Burns, Hoang A. Nguyen, Louise McRae, Hugh P. Possingham, David B. Lindenmayer

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 124 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 234 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 234 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 51 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 16%
Student > Master 18 8%
Student > Bachelor 18 8%
Other 11 5%
Other 39 17%
Unknown 60 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 67 29%
Environmental Science 60 26%
Computer Science 7 3%
Engineering 6 3%
Social Sciences 5 2%
Other 20 9%
Unknown 69 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 77. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 February 2021.
All research outputs
#565,565
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#218
of 5,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,913
of 452,051 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3
of 86 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,051 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 86 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.