You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Unravelling the Scientific Debate on How to Address Wolf-Dog Hybridization in Europe
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2019.00175 |
| Authors |
Valerio Donfrancesco, Paolo Ciucci, Valeria Salvatori, David Benson, Liselotte Wesley Andersen, Elena Bassi, Juan Carlos Blanco, Luigi Boitani, Romolo Caniglia, Antonio Canu, Claudia Capitani, Guillaume Chapron, Sylwia D. Czarnomska, Elena Fabbri, Marco Galaverni, Ana Galov, Olivier Gimenez, Raquel Godinho, Claudia Greco, Maris Hindrikson, Djuro Huber, Pavel Hulva, Włodzimierz Jedrzejewski, Josip Kusak, John D. C. Linnell, Luis Llaneza, José Vicente López-Bao, Peep Männil, Francesca Marucco, Luca Mattioli, Pietro Milanesi, Cyril Milleret, Robert W. Mysłajek, Andres Ordiz, Vicente Palacios, Hans Christian Pedersen, Cino Pertoldi, Malgorzata Pilot, Ettore Randi, Alejandro Rodríguez, Urmas Saarma, Håkan Sand, Massimo Scandura, Astrid Vik Stronen, Elena Tsingarska, Nibedita Mukherjee |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 311 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nigeria | 30 | 10% |
| India | 16 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 10 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 9 | 3% |
| Mexico | 8 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 6 | 2% |
| Chile | 6 | 2% |
| Pakistan | 6 | 2% |
| United States | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 68 | 22% |
| Unknown | 147 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 277 | 89% |
| Scientists | 25 | 8% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 6 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 125 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 125 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 14% |
| Other | 11 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 6% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 22 | 18% |
| Unknown | 33 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 45 | 36% |
| Environmental Science | 21 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 6% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 6% |
| Unknown | 39 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 380. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 March 2024.
All research outputs
#83,284
of 25,746,891 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#22
of 5,295 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,566
of 365,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2
of 137 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,746,891 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,295 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 137 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.