You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
How Does eDNA Compare to Traditional Trapping? Detecting Mosquito Communities in South-African Freshwater Ponds
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, July 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2019.00260 |
| Authors |
Louie Krol, Berry Van der Hoorn, Erin E. Gorsich, Krijn Trimbos, Peter M. van Bodegom, Maarten Schrama |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 27% |
| Netherlands | 4 | 27% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Libya | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 67% |
| Scientists | 5 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 11 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 6% |
| Other | 7 | 10% |
| Unknown | 18 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 22 | 32% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 14 | 20% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 12% |
| Engineering | 4 | 6% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 November 2019.
All research outputs
#3,555,109
of 25,301,208 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,158
of 5,202 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,515
of 353,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#56
of 129 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,301,208 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,202 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 129 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.