You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Improving Restoration Programs Through Greater Connection With Ecological Theory and Better Monitoring
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.00050 |
| Authors |
David Lindenmayer |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 2 | 33% |
| Bangladesh | 1 | 17% |
| Colombia | 1 | 17% |
| Germany | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 50% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 12% |
| Other | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 16 | 14% |
| Unknown | 33 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 42 | 37% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 17% |
| Unspecified | 5 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 6 | 5% |
| Unknown | 36 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 September 2021.
All research outputs
#12,957,297
of 23,197,711 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,040
of 4,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#162,046
of 361,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#69
of 102 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,197,711 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 102 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.