You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Horizon Scanning to Predict and Prioritize Invasive Alien Species With the Potential to Threaten Human Health and Economies on Cyprus
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2020
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2020.566281 |
| Authors |
Jodey M. Peyton, Angeliki F. Martinou, Tim Adriaens, Niki Chartosia, Paraskevi K. Karachle, Wolfgang Rabitsch, Elena Tricarico, Margarita Arianoutsou, Sven Bacher, Ioannis Bazos, Giuseppe Brundu, Elizabeth Bruno-McClung, Iris Charalambidou, Monica Demetriou, Marika Galanidi, Bella Galil, Rhian Guillem, Kypros Hadjiafxentis, Louis Hadjioannou, Margarita Hadjistylli, Jason Michael Hall-Spencer, Carlos Jimenez, Graham Johnstone, Periklis Kleitou, Demetris Kletou, Despina Koukkoularidou, Stalo Leontiou, Norbert Maczey, Nikolas Michailidis, John Owen Mountford, Athina Papatheodoulou, Oliver L. Pescott, Constantinos Phanis, Cristina Preda, Steph Rorke, Richard Shaw, Wojciech Solarz, Chris D. Taylor, Saso Trajanovski, Iakovos Tziortzis, Elli Tzirkalli, Ahmet Uludag, Giovanni Vimercati, Konstantin Zdraveski, Argyro Zenetos, Helen E. Roy |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 6 | 29% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 10% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 10 | 48% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 15 | 71% |
| Scientists | 4 | 19% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 57 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 5% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 8 | 14% |
| Unknown | 23 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 21% |
| Environmental Science | 8 | 14% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 2 | 4% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 6 | 11% |
| Unknown | 26 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#2,550,793
of 25,463,091 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#877
of 5,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,472
of 439,979 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#32
of 147 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,463,091 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 439,979 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 147 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.