↓ Skip to main content

Editorial: Multimodal Mating Signals: Evolution, Genetics and Physiological Background

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2021
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Editorial: Multimodal Mating Signals: Evolution, Genetics and Physiological Background
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, January 2021
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2020.630957
Authors

Astrid T. Groot, Varvara Vedenina, Emily Burdfield-Steel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 50%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 17%
Unknown 2 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 67%
Unknown 2 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 January 2021.
All research outputs
#18,119,559
of 23,274,744 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,969
of 4,315 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#358,137
of 505,211 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#162
of 205 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,274,744 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,315 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 505,211 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 205 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.