You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Toward a Generalizable Framework of Disturbance Ecology Through Crowdsourced Science
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2021.588940 |
| Authors |
Emily B. Graham, Colin Averill, Ben Bond-Lamberty, Joseph E. Knelman, Stefan Krause, Ariane L. Peralta, Ashley Shade, A. Peyton Smith, Susan J. Cheng, Nicolas Fanin, Cathryn Freund, Patricia E. Garcia, Sean M. Gibbons, Marc W. Van Goethem, Marouen Ben Guebila, Julia Kemppinen, Robert J. Nowicki, Juli G. Pausas, Samuel P. Reed, Jennifer Rocca, Aditi Sengupta, Debjani Sihi, Marie Simonin, Michał Słowiński, Seth A. Spawn, Ira Sutherland, Jonathan D. Tonkin, Nathan I. Wisnoski, Samuel C. Zipper, Contributor Consortium, Arie Staal, Bhavna Arora, Callie Oldfield, Dipankar Dwivedi, Erin Larson, Ezequiel Santillan, J. Aaron Hogan, Jeff Atkins, Jianqiu Zheng, Jonas Lembrechts, Kaizad Patel, Kelsey Copes-Gerbitz, Kevin Winker, Laura Mudge, Mark Wong, Martin Nuñez, Miska Luoto, Rebecca Barnes |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 55 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 16 | 29% |
| France | 3 | 5% |
| Poland | 2 | 4% |
| Spain | 2 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 4% |
| Canada | 2 | 4% |
| India | 1 | 2% |
| Comoros | 1 | 2% |
| Brazil | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 9% |
| Unknown | 20 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 30 | 55% |
| Members of the public | 24 | 44% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 88 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 17% |
| Other | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 8% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 15% |
| Unknown | 32 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 21 | 24% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 13% |
| Unspecified | 6 | 7% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 30. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,325,911
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#450
of 5,293 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,341
of 455,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#22
of 231 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,293 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 455,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 231 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.