You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Small Hydropower Plants' Proliferation Would Negatively Affect Local Herpetofauna
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2021.610325 |
| Authors |
Jelka Crnobrnja-Isailović, Bogdan Jovanović, Marija Ilić, Jelena Ćorović, Tijana Čubrić, Dragana Stojadinović, Nada Ćosić |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 5 | 19% |
| Unknown | 10 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 7% |
| Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Unknown | 12 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2021.
All research outputs
#18,785,596
of 23,278,709 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,182
of 4,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#384,744
of 512,894 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#193
of 226 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,278,709 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.5. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 512,894 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 226 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.