You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Teasing Apart Impacts of Human Activity and Regional Drought on Madagascar’s Large Vertebrate Fauna: Insights From New Excavations at Tsimanampesotse and Antsirafaly
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, September 2021
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2021.742203 |
| Authors |
Laurie R. Godfrey, Brooke E. Crowley, Kathleen M. Muldoon, Stephen J. Burns, Nick Scroxton, Zachary S. Klukkert, Lovasoa Ranivoharimanana, Jamie Alumbaugh, Matthew Borths, Ryan Dart, Peterson Faina, Steven M. Goodman, Isaac J. Gutierrez, James P. Hansford, Evon R. Hekkala, Christopher W. Kinsley, Phillip Lehman, Margaret E. Lewis, David McGee, Ventura R. Pérez, Noromamy J. Rahantaharivao, Mamy Rakotoarijaona, Harimanjaka A. M. Rasolonjatovo, Karen E. Samonds, Samuel T. Turvey, Natalie Vasey, Patrick Widmann |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 15% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 8% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 4 | 31% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 7 | 54% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 46% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 19 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 19 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 16% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 16% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 11% |
| Researcher | 2 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 11% |
| Unknown | 5 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 32% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 2 | 11% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 11% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 5% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,056,483
of 23,706,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,025
of 4,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#69,768
of 434,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#45
of 254 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,706,541 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,525 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.3. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 434,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 254 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.