↓ Skip to main content

Poor hDNA-Derived NGS Data May Provide Sufficient Phylogenetic Information of Potentially Extinct Taxa

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
12 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Poor hDNA-Derived NGS Data May Provide Sufficient Phylogenetic Information of Potentially Extinct Taxa
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, May 2022
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2022.907889
Authors

Catharina Clewing, Christian Kehlmaier, Björn Stelbrink, Christian Albrecht, Thomas Wilke

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 12 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 58%
Other 2 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 8%
Professor 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 58%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 8%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 8%
Social Sciences 1 8%
Other 0 0%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 July 2022.
All research outputs
#14,366,938
of 24,144,324 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,429
of 4,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,797
of 429,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#148
of 367 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,144,324 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,779 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 429,297 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 367 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.