↓ Skip to main content

Risks, benefits, and knowledge gaps of non-native tree species in Europe

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2022
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
29 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Risks, benefits, and knowledge gaps of non-native tree species in Europe
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2022
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2022.908464
Authors

Anastazija Dimitrova, Katalin Csilléry, Marcin Klisz, Mathieu Lévesque, Steffi Heinrichs, Maxime Cailleret, Enrique Andivia, Palle Madsen, Henrik Böhenius, Branislav Cvjetkovic, Bart De Cuyper, Giovanbattista de Dato, Peter Ferus, Berthold Heinze, Vladan Ivetić, Zoltan Köbölkuti, Jelena Lazarević, Dagnija Lazdina, Tiit Maaten, Kristaps Makovskis, Jelena Milovanović, Antonio T. Monteiro, Marina Nonić, Simon Place, Radoslaw Puchalka, Antonio Montagnoli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 29 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 29 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 6 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 14%
Unspecified 3 10%
Researcher 2 7%
Student > Bachelor 2 7%
Other 3 10%
Unknown 9 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 34%
Environmental Science 5 17%
Unspecified 3 10%
Linguistics 1 3%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 9 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,491,162
of 23,016,919 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,690
of 4,184 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,903
of 440,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#63
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,016,919 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,184 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 440,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.