↓ Skip to main content

Vacancy analysis and layout optimization of Changdao natural protected area from the perspective of multi-objective collaboration

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2023
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Vacancy analysis and layout optimization of Changdao natural protected area from the perspective of multi-objective collaboration
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2023
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2023.1265428
Authors

Shuai He, Tao Xia, Meixue Luo, Wenwen Li, Junxin Zhang, Yanxiang Li, Shang Chen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 October 2023.
All research outputs
#22,245,490
of 24,825,035 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#4,050
of 5,064 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,362
of 237,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#78
of 161 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,825,035 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,064 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 237,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 161 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.