You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
New perspectives on the evolutionary history of xiphosuran development through comparison with other fossil euchelicerates
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, October 2023
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2023.1270429 |
| Authors |
Lorenzo Lustri, Jonathan B. Antcliffe, Farid Saleh, Carolin Haug, Lukáš Laibl, Russell J. Garwood, Joachim T. Haug, Allison C. Daley |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 3 | 17% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| United States | 1 | 6% |
| Czechia | 1 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 6% |
| France | 1 | 6% |
| Lebanon | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 8 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 8 | 44% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2024.
All research outputs
#2,358,945
of 25,805,386 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#816
of 5,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,300
of 361,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#11
of 217 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,805,386 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 217 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.