↓ Skip to main content

Aquatic protected area system in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: establishment, challenges and prospects

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2024
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (64th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Aquatic protected area system in the Qinghai–Tibet Plateau: establishment, challenges and prospects
Published in
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, April 2024
DOI 10.3389/fevo.2024.1204494
Authors

Haoran Li, Lu Tan, Xianfu Li, Qinghua Cai

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2024.
All research outputs
#17,483,645
of 25,646,963 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#3,227
of 5,290 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,985
of 165,430 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#24
of 67 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,646,963 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,290 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,430 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 67 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.