You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Establishment of terrestrial mammals on former reservoir beds following large dam removal on the Elwha River, Washington, USA
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, March 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2024.1266474 |
| Authors |
Rebecca M. McCaffery, Sara J. Cendejas-Zarelli, Katy R. Goodwin, Patricia J. Happe, Kurt J. Jenkins, Kimberly A. Sager-Fradkin |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 50% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 17% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2024.
All research outputs
#15,048,620
of 25,582,611 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#2,469
of 5,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#58,855
of 158,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#19
of 74 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,582,611 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 158,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 74 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.