You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Assessing microbial diversity in Yellowstone National Park hot springs using a field deployable automated nucleic acid extraction system
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution, February 2024
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fevo.2024.1306008 |
| Authors |
Jason M. Wood, Camilla Urbaniak, Ceth Parker, Nitin Kumar Singh, Season Wong, Arunkumar Arumugam, Dana J. Skorupa, Ashlyn Hemmah, Phoebe Laaguiby, Fathi Karouia, Brent M. Peyton, Scott Tighe, Kasthuri Venkateswaran |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 11% |
| India | 1 | 5% |
| Italy | 1 | 5% |
| Pakistan | 1 | 5% |
| Australia | 1 | 5% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 5% |
| Ecuador | 1 | 5% |
| Argentina | 1 | 5% |
| France | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 10 | 53% |
| Members of the public | 8 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 March 2024.
All research outputs
#3,233,137
of 25,587,485 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#1,090
of 5,288 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#42,371
of 329,725 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution
#26
of 152 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,587,485 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,288 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,725 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 152 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.