↓ Skip to main content

Dystrophin Orchestrates the Epigenetic Profile of Muscle Cells Via miRNAs

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
15 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
57 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dystrophin Orchestrates the Epigenetic Profile of Muscle Cells Via miRNAs
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2011.00064
Pubmed ID
Authors

April K. Marrone, Halyna R. Shcherbata

Abstract

Mammalian musculature is a very robust and dynamic tissue that goes through many rounds of degeneration and regeneration in an individual's lifetime. There is a biological program that maintains muscle progenitor cells that, when activated, give rise to intermediate myoblast progeny that consequently differentiate into mature muscle cells. Recent works have provided a picture of the role that microRNAs (miRNAs) play in maintaining aspects of this program. Intriguingly, a subset of these miRNAs is de-regulated in muscular dystrophies (MDs), a group of fatal inherited neuromuscular disorders that are often associated with deficiencies in the Dystrophin (Dys) complex. Apparently, transcriptional expression of many of the muscle specific genes and miRNAs is dependent on chromatin state regulated by the Dys-Syn-nNOS pathway. This puts Dystrophin at the epicenter of a highly regulated program of muscle gene expression in which miRNAs help to coordinate networking between multiple phases of muscle maintenance, degeneration, and regeneration. Therefore, understanding the role of miRNAs in physiology of normal and diseased muscle tissue could be useful for future applications in improving the MD therapies and could open new clinical perspectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 57 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Hungary 1 2%
Italy 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Serbia 1 2%
Unknown 52 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 13 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 19%
Student > Master 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Other 12 21%
Unknown 6 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 54%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 5%
Computer Science 1 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 2 4%
Unknown 7 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2012.
All research outputs
#14,142,788
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,880
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,259
of 180,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#24
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.