↓ Skip to main content

On Detecting Selective Sweeps Using Single Genomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On Detecting Selective Sweeps Using Single Genomes
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2011
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2011.00085
Pubmed ID
Authors

Priyanka Sinha, Aslihan Dincer, Daniel Virgil, Guang Xu, Yu-Ping Poh, Jeffrey D. Jensen

Abstract

Identifying the genetic basis of human adaptation has remained a central focal point of modern population genetics. One major area of interest has been the use of polymorphism data to detect so-called "footprints" of selective sweeps - patterns produced as a beneficial mutation arises and rapidly fixes in the population. Based on numerous simulation studies and power analyses, the necessary sample size for achieving appreciable power has been shown to vary from a few individuals to a few dozen, depending on the test statistic. And yet, the sequencing of multiple copies of a single region, or of multiple genomes as is now often the case, incurs considerable cost. Enard et al. (2010) have recently proposed a method to identify patterns of selective sweeps using a single genome - and apply this approach to human and non-human primates (chimpanzee, orangutan, and macaque). They employ essentially a modification of the Hudson, Kreitman, and Aguade test - using heterozygous single nucleotide polymorphisms from single individuals, and divergence data from two closely related species (human-chimpanzee, human-orangutan, and human-macaque). Given the potential importance of this finding, we here investigate the properties of this statistic. We demonstrate through simulation that this approach is neither robust to demography nor background selection; nor is it robust to variable recombination rates.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 8%
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 22 88%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 44%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 24%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 8%
Student > Master 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 1 4%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 76%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 12%
Computer Science 1 4%
Unknown 2 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,317,537
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,975
of 11,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#159,975
of 180,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#48
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 180,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.