↓ Skip to main content

Six Degrees of Epistasis: Statistical Network Models for GWAS

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (74th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (75th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Six Degrees of Epistasis: Statistical Network Models for GWAS
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2011.00109
Pubmed ID
Authors

B. A. McKinney, Nicholas M. Pajewski

Abstract

There is growing evidence that much more of the genome than previously thought is required to explain the heritability of complex phenotypes. Recent studies have demonstrated that numerous common variants from across the genome explain portions of genetic variability, spawning various avenues of research directed at explaining the remaining heritability. This polygenic structure is also the motivation for the growing application of pathway and gene set enrichment techniques, which have yielded promising results. These findings suggest that the coordination of genes in pathways that are known to occur at the gene regulatory level also can be detected at the population level. Although genes in these networks interact in complex ways, most population studies have focused on the additive contribution of common variants and the potential of rare variants to explain additional variation. In this brief review, we discuss the potential to explain additional genetic variation through the agglomeration of multiple gene-gene interactions as well as main effects of common variants in terms of a network paradigm. Just as is the case for single-locus contributions, we expect each gene-gene interaction edge in the network to have a small effect, but these effects may be reinforced through hubs and other connectivity structures in the network. We discuss some of the opportunities and challenges of network methods for analyzing genome-wide association studies (GWAS) such as the study of hubs and motifs, and integrating other types of variation and environmental interactions. Such network approaches may unveil hidden variation in GWAS, improve understanding of mechanisms of disease, and possibly fit into a network paradigm of evolutionary genetics.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 7 6%
Germany 2 2%
France 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Greece 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 105 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 41 34%
Researcher 26 21%
Professor > Associate Professor 15 12%
Professor 6 5%
Student > Master 6 5%
Other 14 12%
Unknown 13 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 59 49%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 7%
Computer Science 6 5%
Neuroscience 5 4%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 18 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2013.
All research outputs
#6,378,310
of 22,662,201 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,945
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,615
of 244,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#56
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,662,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,049 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.