↓ Skip to main content

Dark Matter RNA: Existence, Function, and Controversy

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
124 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Dark Matter RNA: Existence, Function, and Controversy
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00060
Pubmed ID
Authors

Philipp Kapranov, Georges St. Laurent

Abstract

The mysteries surrounding the ∼97-98% of the human genome that does not encode proteins have long captivated imagination of scientists. Does the protein-coding, 2-3% of the genome carry the 97-98% as a mere passenger and neutral "cargo" on the evolutionary path, or does the latter have biological function? On one side of the debate, many commentaries have referred to the non-coding portion of the genome as "selfish" or "junk" DNA (Orgel and Crick, 1980), while on the other side, authors have argued that it contains the real blueprint for organismal development (Penman, 1995; Mattick, 2003), and the mechanisms of developmental complexity. Thus, this question could be referred to without much exaggeration as the most important issue in genetics today.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 124 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
Netherlands 2 2%
Germany 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 117 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 38 31%
Researcher 24 19%
Student > Master 16 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 5%
Student > Bachelor 5 4%
Other 15 12%
Unknown 20 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 52 42%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 20%
Chemistry 6 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 3%
Engineering 4 3%
Other 12 10%
Unknown 21 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 August 2020.
All research outputs
#12,661,239
of 22,664,644 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,556
of 11,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#141,645
of 244,053 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#79
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,664,644 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,727 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,053 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.