↓ Skip to main content

Statistical Properties of Multivariate Distance Matrix Regression for High-Dimensional Data Analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
142 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Statistical Properties of Multivariate Distance Matrix Regression for High-Dimensional Data Analysis
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00190
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew A. Zapala, Nicholas J. Schork

Abstract

Multivariate distance matrix regression (MDMR) analysis is a statistical technique that allows researchers to relate P variables to an additional M factors collected on N individuals, where P ≫ N. The technique can be applied to a number of research settings involving high-dimensional data types such as DNA sequence data, gene expression microarray data, and imaging data. MDMR analysis involves computing the distance between all pairs of individuals with respect to P variables of interest and constructing an N × N matrix whose elements reflect these distances. Permutation tests can be used to test linear hypotheses that consider whether or not the M additional factors collected on the individuals can explain variation in the observed distances between and among the N individuals as reflected in the matrix. Despite its appeal and utility, properties of the statistics used in MDMR analysis have not been explored in detail. In this paper we consider the level accuracy and power of MDMR analysis assuming different distance measures and analysis settings. We also describe the utility of MDMR analysis in assessing hypotheses about the appropriate number of clusters arising from a cluster analysis.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 142 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
United States 2 1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 133 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 25%
Researcher 19 13%
Student > Master 16 11%
Other 10 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 29 20%
Unknown 23 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 37 26%
Mathematics 10 7%
Neuroscience 9 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 6%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 6%
Other 38 27%
Unknown 32 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 June 2015.
All research outputs
#17,666,399
of 22,679,690 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#6,007
of 11,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#191,325
of 244,102 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#169
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,679,690 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,739 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,102 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.