↓ Skip to main content

Induction of p53-inducible microRNA miR-34 by gamma radiation and bleomycin are different

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site

Readers on

mendeley
16 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Induction of p53-inducible microRNA miR-34 by gamma radiation and bleomycin are different
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00220
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ufuk Mert, Emre Özgür, Duygu Tiryakioglu, Nejay Dalay, Ugur Gezer

Abstract

microRNAs (miRNAs) are small molecules in their mature form and master regulators of gene expression. Recent work has shown that miRNAs are involved in the p53 network. Of the various miRNAs, miR-34 is regulated by the p53 protein. miR-34 can be induced by ionizing radiation (IR) in vitro and in vivo. However, there is no data in the literature for induction of miR-34 by a chemical agent inducing DNA damage. Here we studied the expression of miR-34 in HeLa and MCF-7 cells exposed to genotoxic stress-induced by bleomycin (BLM) or γ-radiation. We first analyzed p53 accumulation upon DNA damage induction. The basal level of p53 in MCF-7 cells was higher (approx. 6-fold) than in HeLa cells, and its accumulation was similar for both DNA-damaging agents in both cell lines. We have shown that miR-34 is significantly induced by γ-radiation in HeLa cells, but not in MCF-7 cells. BLM did not significantly affect miR-34 expression in both cell types. In conclusion, our findings reveal that miR-34 induction by genotoxic stress may be cell-type specific.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 16 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 5 31%
Student > Ph. D. Student 4 25%
Student > Bachelor 2 13%
Student > Master 2 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 1 6%
Other 1 6%
Unknown 1 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 63%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 6%
Arts and Humanities 1 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 6%
Engineering 1 6%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 2 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 October 2012.
All research outputs
#13,369,262
of 22,681,577 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,230
of 11,749 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#146,672
of 244,101 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#96
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,681,577 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,749 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,101 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.