↓ Skip to main content

Replaying the Tape of Life: Quantification of the Predictability of Evolution

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (92nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
6 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
103 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Replaying the Tape of Life: Quantification of the Predictability of Evolution
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2012
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00246
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alexander E. Lobkovsky, Eugene V. Koonin

Abstract

The question whether adaptation follows a deterministic route largely prescribed by the environment or can proceed along a large number of alternative trajectories has engaged extensive research over the recent years. Experimental evolution studies enabled by advances in high throughput techniques for genome sequencing and manipulation, along with increasingly detailed mathematical modeling of fitness landscapes, are beginning to allow quantitative exploration of the repeatability of evolutionary trajectories. It is becoming clear that evolutionary trajectories in static correlated fitness landscapes are substantially non-random but the relative contributions of determinism and stochasticity in the evolution of specific phenotypes strongly depend on the specific conditions, particularly the magnitude of the selective pressure and the number of available beneficial mutations.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Austria 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 27%
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Bachelor 23 11%
Student > Master 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 6%
Other 34 17%
Unknown 20 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 110 55%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 19%
Computer Science 4 2%
Environmental Science 4 2%
Physics and Astronomy 4 2%
Other 13 6%
Unknown 28 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 April 2018.
All research outputs
#2,197,637
of 22,687,320 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#523
of 11,752 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,319
of 244,125 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#16
of 255 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,687,320 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,752 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 244,125 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 255 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.