↓ Skip to main content

Premature and accelerated aging: HIV or HAART?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
203 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Premature and accelerated aging: HIV or HAART?
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2012.00328
Pubmed ID
Authors

Reuben L. Smith, Richard de Boer, Stanley Brul, Yelena Budovskaya, Hans van der Spek

Abstract

Highly active antiretroviral therapy (HAART) has significantly increased life expectancy of the human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-positive population. Nevertheless, the average lifespan of HIV-patients remains shorter compared to uninfected individuals. Immunosenescence, a current explanation for this difference invokes heavily on viral stimulus despite HAART efficiency in viral suppression. We propose here that the premature and accelerated aging of HIV-patients can also be caused by adverse effects of antiretroviral drugs, specifically those that affect the mitochondria. The nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NRTI) antiretroviral drug class for instance, is known to cause depletion of mitochondrial DNA via inhibition of the mitochondrial specific DNA polymerase-γ. Besides NRTIs, other antiretroviral drug classes such as protease inhibitors also cause severe mitochondrial damage by increasing oxidative stress and diminishing mitochondrial function. We also discuss important areas for future research and argue in favor of the use of Caenorhabditis elegans as a novel model system for studying these effects.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 203 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 199 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 43 21%
Researcher 36 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 27 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 5%
Other 21 10%
Unknown 32 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 25 12%
Immunology and Microbiology 14 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 4%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 38 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 January 2014.
All research outputs
#5,442,618
of 22,691,736 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,515
of 11,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#57,186
of 280,671 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#62
of 319 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,691,736 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,754 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,671 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 319 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.