↓ Skip to main content

Multivariate Analysis of Functional Metagenomes

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Readers on

mendeley
294 Mendeley
citeulike
3 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Multivariate Analysis of Functional Metagenomes
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00041
Pubmed ID
Authors

Elizabeth A. Dinsdale, Robert A. Edwards, Barbara A. Bailey, Imre Tuba, Sajia Akhter, Katelyn McNair, Robert Schmieder, Naneh Apkarian, Michelle Creek, Eric Guan, Mayra Hernandez, Katherine Isaacs, Chris Peterson, Todd Regh, Vadim Ponomarenko

Abstract

Metagenomics is a primary tool for the description of microbial and viral communities. The sheer magnitude of the data generated in each metagenome makes identifying key differences in the function and taxonomy between communities difficult to elucidate. Here we discuss the application of seven different data mining and statistical analyses by comparing and contrasting the metabolic functions of 212 microbial metagenomes within and between 10 environments. Not all approaches are appropriate for all questions, and researchers should decide which approach addresses their questions. This work demonstrated the use of each approach: for example, random forests provided a robust and enlightening description of both the clustering of metagenomes and the metabolic processes that were important in separating microbial communities from different environments. All analyses identified that the presence of phage genes within the microbial community was a predictor of whether the microbial community was host-associated or free-living. Several analyses identified the subtle differences that occur with environments, such as those seen in different regions of the marine environment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 294 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 13 4%
Brazil 4 1%
Canada 2 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Chile 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 269 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 77 26%
Researcher 59 20%
Student > Master 38 13%
Student > Bachelor 28 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 8%
Other 49 17%
Unknown 20 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 142 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 41 14%
Environmental Science 18 6%
Computer Science 15 5%
Engineering 12 4%
Other 33 11%
Unknown 33 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 January 2016.
All research outputs
#4,646,489
of 23,577,654 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,417
of 12,604 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,702
of 284,930 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#58
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,654 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,604 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,930 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.