↓ Skip to main content

A review of potassium channels in bipolar disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (76th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
8 X users
reddit
2 Redditors

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
72 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A review of potassium channels in bipolar disorder
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2013
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2013.00105
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jennifer T. Judy, Peter P. Zandi

Abstract

Although bipolar disorder (BP) is one of the most heritable psychiatric conditions, susceptibility genes for the disorder have yet to be conclusively identified. It is likely that variants in multiple genes across multiple pathways contribute to the genotype-phenotype relationship in the affected population. Recent evidence from genome-wide association studies implicates an entire class of genes related to the structure and regulation of ion channels, suggesting that the etiology of BP may arise from channelopathies. In this review, we examine the evidence for this hypothesis, with a focus on the potential role of voltage-gated potassium channels. We consider evidence from genetic and expression studies, and discuss the potential underlying biology. We consider animal models and treatment implications of the involvement of potassium ion channelopathy in BP. Finally, we explore intriguing parallels between BP and epilepsy, the signature channelopathy of the central nervous system.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 72 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 2 3%
Chile 1 1%
Unknown 69 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 14 19%
Student > Bachelor 12 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 13%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 11%
Other 5 7%
Other 12 17%
Unknown 12 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 20 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 10%
Neuroscience 6 8%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 7%
Other 9 13%
Unknown 15 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 October 2016.
All research outputs
#6,487,976
of 24,226,848 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,841
of 13,008 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#66,401
of 289,058 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#75
of 318 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,226,848 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,008 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 289,058 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 318 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.