You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mechanisms and proteins involved in long-distance interactions
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00028 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Oksana Maksimenko, Pavel Georgiev |
| Abstract |
Due to advances in genome-wide technologies, consistent distant interactions within chromosomes of higher eukaryotes have been revealed. In particular, it has been shown that enhancers can specifically and directly interact with promoters by looping out intervening sequences, which can be up to several hundred kilobases long. This review is focused on transcription factors that are supposed to be involved in long-range interactions. Available data are in agreement with the model that several known transcription factors and insulator proteins belong to an abundant but poorly studied class of proteins that are responsible for chromosomal architecture. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Switzerland | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Russia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 29 | 32% |
| Researcher | 21 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 48 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 26 | 29% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 11 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2014.
All research outputs
#13,910,091
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,504
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#170,174
of 305,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#28
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.