You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Genomic data-sharing: what will be our legacy?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00034 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shawneequa Callier, Rajah Husain, Rachel Simpson |
| Abstract |
Prior to 1974, the Tuskegee Syphilis experiments, expansive use of the HeLa cells, and other blatant instances of research abuse pervaded the medical research field. Ongoing challenges to informed consent, privacy and data-sharing will influence the stories that research participants today share with future generations. This has significant implications for the advancement of genomic science, and the public's perception of genomic research. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 40% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 10% |
| India | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 4 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 60% |
| Scientists | 4 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 41 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| United States | 1 | 2% |
| Nigeria | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 38 | 93% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 29% |
| Researcher | 5 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 7% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 20% |
| Unknown | 7 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 10 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 9 | 22% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 12% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 7% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 June 2016.
All research outputs
#6,140,061
of 24,972,914 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,730
of 13,434 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#53,270
of 227,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#13
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,972,914 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,434 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.