↓ Skip to main content

The analytical landscape of static and temporal dynamics in transcriptome data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
11 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
28 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
135 Mendeley
citeulike
2 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The analytical landscape of static and temporal dynamics in transcriptome data
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00035
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sunghee Oh, Seongho Song, Nupur Dasgupta, Gregory Grabowski

Abstract

Interpreting gene expression profiles often involves statistical analysis of large numbers of differentially expressed genes, isoforms, and alternative splicing events at either static or dynamic spectrums. Reduced sequencing costs have made feasible dense time-series analysis of gene expression using RNA-seq; however, statistical methods in the context of temporal RNA-seq data are poorly developed. Here we will review current methods for identifying temporal changes in gene expression using RNA-seq, which are limited to static pairwise comparisons of time points and which fail to account for temporal dependencies in gene expression patterns. We also review recently developed very few number of temporal dynamic RNA-seq specific methods. Application and development of RNA-specific temporal dynamic methods have been continuously under the development, yet, it is still in infancy. We fully cover microarray specific temporal methods and transcriptome studies in initial digital technology (e.g., SAGE) between traditional microarray and new RNA-seq.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 135 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Finland 1 <1%
Unknown 127 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 39 29%
Researcher 39 29%
Student > Master 13 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 8 6%
Other 7 5%
Other 19 14%
Unknown 10 7%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 65 48%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 9 7%
Mathematics 5 4%
Computer Science 3 2%
Other 10 7%
Unknown 11 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 August 2015.
All research outputs
#2,109,197
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#495
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,862
of 305,223 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#6
of 54 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 305,223 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 54 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.