↓ Skip to main content

tRNADB-CE: tRNA gene database well-timed in the era of big sequence data

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
tRNADB-CE: tRNA gene database well-timed in the era of big sequence data
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00114
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Abe, Hachiro Inokuchi, Yuko Yamada, Akira Muto, Yuki Iwasaki, Toshimichi Ikemura

Abstract

The tRNA gene data base curated by experts "tRNADB-CE" (http://trna.ie.niigata-u.ac.jp) was constructed by analyzing 1,966 complete and 5,272 draft genomes of prokaryotes, 171 viruses', 121 chloroplasts', and 12 eukaryotes' genomes plus fragment sequences obtained by metagenome studies of environmental samples. 595,115 tRNA genes in total, and thus two times of genes compiled previously, have been registered, for which sequence, clover-leaf structure, and results of sequence-similarity and oligonucleotide-pattern searches can be browsed. To provide collective knowledge with help from experts in tRNA researches, we added a column for enregistering comments to each tRNA. By grouping bacterial tRNAs with an identical sequence, we have found high phylogenetic preservation of tRNA sequences, especially at the phylum level. Since many species-unknown tRNAs from metagenomic sequences have sequences identical to those found in species-known prokaryotes, the identical sequence group (ISG) can provide phylogenetic markers to investigate the microbial community in an environmental ecosystem. This strategy can be applied to a huge amount of short sequences obtained from next-generation sequencers, as showing that tRNADB-CE is a well-timed database in the era of big sequence data. It is also discussed that batch-learning self-organizing-map with oligonucleotide composition is useful for efficient knowledge discovery from big sequence data.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 3%
Italy 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 73 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 29%
Student > Master 13 17%
Researcher 11 14%
Student > Bachelor 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 4%
Other 8 10%
Unknown 14 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 23%
Computer Science 6 8%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 May 2014.
All research outputs
#6,405,163
of 22,754,104 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,958
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#61,894
of 227,852 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#39
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,754,104 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,852 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.