You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Quality control on the frontier
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, May 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00157 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Konrad H. Paszkiewicz, Audrey Farbos, Paul O'Neill, Karen Moore |
| Abstract |
In the world of high-throughput sequencing there are numerous challenges to effective data quality control. There are no single quality metrics which are appropriate in all conditions. Here we detail the different open source software used at the Exeter Sequencing Service to provide generic quality control information, as well as more specific metrics for genomic and transcriptomic libraries run on Illumina platforms. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 43% |
| United States | 1 | 14% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 2 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 4 | 57% |
| Members of the public | 3 | 43% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Portugal | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Argentina | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| United States | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 70 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 26 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 17% |
| Other | 9 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 14% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 33 | 43% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 20 | 26% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 4 | 5% |
| Computer Science | 4 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 8% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2023.
All research outputs
#5,134,809
of 25,161,628 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,594
of 13,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#46,463
of 232,722 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#27
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,161,628 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,545 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 232,722 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.