↓ Skip to main content

Genetic-based prediction of disease traits: prediction is very difficult, especially about the future†

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
19 X users
patent
2 patents

Readers on

mendeley
163 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genetic-based prediction of disease traits: prediction is very difficult, especially about the future†
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00162
Pubmed ID
Authors

Steven J. Schrodi, Shubhabrata Mukherjee, Ying Shan, Gerard Tromp, John J. Sninsky, Amy P. Callear, Tonia C. Carter, Zhan Ye, Jonathan L. Haines, Murray H. Brilliant, Paul K. Crane, Diane T. Smelser, Robert C. Elston, Daniel E. Weeks

Abstract

Translation of results from genetic findings to inform medical practice is a highly anticipated goal of human genetics. The aim of this paper is to review and discuss the role of genetics in medically-relevant prediction. Germline genetics presages disease onset and therefore can contribute prognostic signals that augment laboratory tests and clinical features. As such, the impact of genetic-based predictive models on clinical decisions and therapy choice could be profound. However, given that (i) medical traits result from a complex interplay between genetic and environmental factors, (ii) the underlying genetic architectures for susceptibility to common diseases are not well-understood, and (iii) replicable susceptibility alleles, in combination, account for only a moderate amount of disease heritability, there are substantial challenges to constructing and implementing genetic risk prediction models with high utility. In spite of these challenges, concerted progress has continued in this area with an ongoing accumulation of studies that identify disease predisposing genotypes. Several statistical approaches with the aim of predicting disease have been published. Here we summarize the current state of disease susceptibility mapping and pharmacogenetics efforts for risk prediction, describe methods used to construct and evaluate genetic-based predictive models, and discuss applications.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 163 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 3%
United Kingdom 3 2%
France 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Israel 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Unknown 150 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 19%
Student > Master 24 15%
Student > Postgraduate 9 6%
Student > Bachelor 9 6%
Other 34 21%
Unknown 21 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 23%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 37 23%
Medicine and Dentistry 20 12%
Computer Science 17 10%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Other 20 12%
Unknown 25 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 25. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 January 2022.
All research outputs
#1,404,579
of 24,155,398 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#271
of 12,970 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,125
of 231,390 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#5
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,155,398 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,970 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 231,390 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.