↓ Skip to main content

Phosphorylation of unique domains of Src family kinases

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, June 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Phosphorylation of unique domains of Src family kinases
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00181
Pubmed ID
Authors

Irene Amata, Mariano Maffei, Miquel Pons

Abstract

Members of the Src family of kinases (SFKs) are non-receptor tyrosine kinases involved in numerous signal transduction pathways. The catalytic, SH3 and SH2 domains are attached to the membrane-anchoring SH4 domain through the intrinsically disordered "Unique" domains, which exhibit strong sequence divergence among SFK members. In the last decade, structural and biochemical studies have begun to uncover the crucial role of the Unique domain in the regulation of SFK activity. This mini-review discusses what is known about the phosphorylation events taking place on the SFK Unique domains, and their biological relevance. The modulation by phosphorylation of biologically relevant inter- and intra- molecular interactions of Src, as well as the existence of complex phosphorylation/dephosphorylation patterns observed for the Unique domain of Src, reinforces the important functional role of the Unique domain in the regulation mechanisms of the Src kinases and, in a wider context, of intrinsically disordered regions in cellular processes.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Japan 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 157 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 40 25%
Student > Master 23 14%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 17 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 34 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 46 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 25%
Chemistry 8 5%
Immunology and Microbiology 6 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 4%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 37 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2014.
All research outputs
#14,134,663
of 22,757,541 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,854
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,381
of 226,817 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#75
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,541 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,817 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.