You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
eMERGEing progress in genomics—the first seven years
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Frontiers in Genetics, June 2014
|
| DOI | 10.3389/fgene.2014.00184 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Dana C. Crawford, David R. Crosslin, Gerard Tromp, Iftikhar J. Kullo, Helena Kuivaniemi, M. Geoffrey Hayes, Joshua C. Denny, William S. Bush, Jonathan L. Haines, Dan M. Roden, Catherine A. McCarty, Gail P. Jarvik, Marylyn D. Ritchie |
| Abstract |
The electronic MEdical Records & GEnomics (eMERGE) network was established in 2007 by the National Human Genome Research Institute (NHGRI) of the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in part to explore the utility of electronic medical records (EMRs) in genome science. The initial focus was on discovery primarily using the genome-wide association paradigm, but more recently, the network has begun evaluating mechanisms to implement new genomic information coupled to clinical decision support into EMRs. Herein, we describe this evolution including the development of the individual and merged eMERGE genomic datasets, the contribution the network has made toward genomic discovery and human health, and the steps taken toward the next generation genotype-phenotype association studies and clinical implementation. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 43% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 7% |
| France | 1 | 7% |
| Denmark | 1 | 7% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| India | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 2 | 14% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 50% |
| Scientists | 6 | 43% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 6% |
| Canada | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 63 | 89% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 17 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 6 | 8% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 13 | 18% |
| Unknown | 9 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 20 | 28% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 23% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 14% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 6% |
| Unknown | 11 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2015.
All research outputs
#3,681,390
of 22,757,090 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,115
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#36,793
of 228,185 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#20
of 122 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,757,090 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 228,185 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 122 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.