↓ Skip to main content

On best practices in the development of bioinformatics software

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (99th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
59 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
3 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
79 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
On best practices in the development of bioinformatics software
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, July 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00199
Pubmed ID
Authors

Felipe da Veiga Leprevost, Valmir C. Barbosa, Eduardo L. Francisco, Yasset Perez-Riverol, Paulo C. Carvalho

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 59 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 4%
United Kingdom 2 3%
Australia 2 3%
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
South Africa 1 1%
Unknown 68 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 24%
Researcher 19 24%
Student > Master 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Professor 4 5%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 11 14%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 25 32%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 14 18%
Computer Science 12 15%
Engineering 4 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 3%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 11 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 44. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2016.
All research outputs
#942,117
of 25,505,015 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#146
of 13,743 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,924
of 242,304 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#2
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,505,015 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,743 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,304 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.