↓ Skip to main content

Toward a systems-level view of dynamic phosphorylation networks

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Toward a systems-level view of dynamic phosphorylation networks
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00263
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert H. Newman, Jin Zhang, Heng Zhu

Abstract

To better understand how cells sense and respond to their environment, it is important to understand the organization and regulation of the phosphorylation networks that underlie most cellular signal transduction pathways. These networks, which are composed of protein kinases, protein phosphatases and their respective cellular targets, are highly dynamic. Importantly, to achieve signaling specificity, phosphorylation networks must be regulated at several levels, including at the level of protein expression, substrate recognition, and spatiotemporal modulation of enzymatic activity. Here, we briefly summarize some of the traditional methods used to study the phosphorylation status of cellular proteins before focusing our attention on several recent technological advances, such as protein microarrays, quantitative mass spectrometry, and genetically-targetable fluorescent biosensors, that are offering new insights into the organization and regulation of cellular phosphorylation networks. Together, these approaches promise to lead to a systems-level view of dynamic phosphorylation networks.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
Germany 1 1%
France 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 87 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 33%
Researcher 14 15%
Student > Master 11 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 7%
Student > Postgraduate 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 10 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 44%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 21 22%
Engineering 6 6%
Chemistry 5 5%
Computer Science 4 4%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 10 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 November 2014.
All research outputs
#13,336,613
of 22,760,687 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,151
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,864
of 230,675 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#73
of 138 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,760,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,675 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 138 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.