↓ Skip to main content

Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
161 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
251 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Physicochemical mechanisms of protein regulation by phosphorylation
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00270
Pubmed ID
Authors

Hafumi Nishi, Alexey Shaytan, Anna R. Panchenko

Abstract

Phosphorylation offers a dynamic way to regulate protein activity and subcellular localization, which is achieved through its reversibility and fast kinetics. Adding or removing a dianionic phosphate group somewhere on a protein often changes the protein's structural properties, its stability and dynamics. Moreover, the majority of signaling pathways involve an extensive set of protein-protein interactions, and phosphorylation can be used to regulate and modulate protein-protein binding. Losses of phosphorylation sites, as a result of disease mutations, might disrupt protein binding and deregulate signal transduction. In this paper we focus on the effects of phosphorylation on protein stability, dynamics, and binding. We describe several physico-chemical mechanisms of protein regulation through phosphorylation and pay particular attention to phosphorylation in protein complexes and phosphorylation in the context of disorder-order and order-disorder transitions. Finally we assess the role of multiple phosphorylation sites in a protein molecule, their possible cooperativity and function.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 251 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 246 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 65 26%
Student > Master 39 16%
Researcher 33 13%
Student > Bachelor 24 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 13 5%
Other 23 9%
Unknown 54 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 84 33%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 41 16%
Chemistry 18 7%
Neuroscience 8 3%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 7 3%
Other 34 14%
Unknown 59 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 August 2014.
All research outputs
#14,135,928
of 22,759,618 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,854
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#118,014
of 230,235 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#84
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,759,618 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 230,235 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.