↓ Skip to main content

Gene–environment interactions in human health: case studies and strategies for developing new paradigms and research methodologies

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
4 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
48 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Gene–environment interactions in human health: case studies and strategies for developing new paradigms and research methodologies
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, August 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00271
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fatimah L C Jackson

Abstract

THE SYNERGISTIC EFFECTS OF GENES AND THE ENVIRONMENT ON HEALTH ARE EXPLORED IN THREE CASE STUDIES: adult lactase persistence, autism spectrum disorders, and the metabolic syndrome, providing examples of the interactive complexities underlying these phenotypes. Since the phenotypes are the initial targets of evolutionary processes, understanding the specific environmental contexts of the genetic, epigenetic, and environmental changes associated with these phenotypes is essential in predicting their health implications. Robust databases must be developed on the local scale to deconstruct both the population substructure and the unique components of the environment that stimulate geographically specific changes in gene expression patterns. To produce these databases and make valid predictions, new, locally focused, and information-dense models are needed that incorporate data on evolutionary ecology, environmental complexity, local geographic patterns of gene expression, and population substructure.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 48 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Unknown 46 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 15%
Student > Master 6 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Student > Bachelor 4 8%
Professor 3 6%
Other 10 21%
Unknown 14 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 6 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 10%
Social Sciences 5 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 8%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 17 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#4,926,878
of 23,884,093 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#1,528
of 12,833 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,541
of 239,405 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#20
of 131 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,884,093 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 12,833 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,405 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 131 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.