↓ Skip to main content

The fragile X syndrome–autism comorbidity: what do we really know?

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
facebook
8 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
2 Google+ users

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The fragile X syndrome–autism comorbidity: what do we really know?
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00355
Pubmed ID
Authors

Leonard Abbeduto, Andrea McDuffie, Angela John Thurman

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is a common comorbid condition in people with fragile X syndrome (FXS). It has been assumed that ASD symptoms reflect the same underlying psychological and neurobiological impairments in both FXS and non-syndromic ASD, which has led to the claim that targeted pharmaceutical treatments that are efficacious for core symptoms of FXS are likely to be beneficial for non-syndromic ASD as well. In contrast, we present evidence from a variety of sources suggesting that there are important differences in ASD symptoms, behavioral and psychiatric correlates, and developmental trajectories between individuals with comorbid FXS and ASD and those with non-syndromic ASD. We also present evidence suggesting that social impairments may not distinguish individuals with FXS with and without ASD. Finally, we present data that demonstrate that the neurobiological substrates of the behavioral impairments, including those reflecting core ASD symptoms, are different in FXS and non-syndromic ASD. Together, these data suggest that there are clinically important differences between FXS and non-syndromic ASD that are masked by reliance on the categorical diagnosis of ASD. We argue for use of a symptom-based approach in future research, including studies designed to evaluate treatment efficacy.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 199 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 17%
Student > Bachelor 29 14%
Researcher 25 13%
Student > Master 24 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Other 29 14%
Unknown 40 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 59 30%
Neuroscience 26 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 6%
Other 19 10%
Unknown 47 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 23. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 November 2019.
All research outputs
#1,657,082
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#332
of 13,779 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,270
of 268,819 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#3
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,779 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 268,819 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.