↓ Skip to main content

A 2-step strategy for detecting pleiotropic effects on multiple longitudinal traits

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, October 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
A 2-step strategy for detecting pleiotropic effects on multiple longitudinal traits
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, October 2014
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00357
Pubmed ID
Authors

Weiqiang Wang, Zeny Feng, Shelley B. Bull, Zuoheng Wang

Abstract

Genetic pleiotropy refers to the situation in which a single gene influences multiple traits and so it is considered as a major factor that underlies genetic correlation among traits. To identify pleiotropy, an important focus in genome-wide association studies (GWAS) is on finding genetic variants that are simultaneously associated with multiple traits. On the other hand, longitudinal designs are often employed in many complex disease studies, such that, traits are measured repeatedly over time within the same subject. Performing genetic association analysis simultaneously on multiple longitudinal traits for detecting pleiotropic effects is interesting but challenging. In this paper, we propose a 2-step method for simultaneously testing the genetic association with multiple longitudinal traits. In the first step, a mixed effects model is used to analyze each longitudinal trait. We focus on estimation of the random effect that accounts for the subject-specific genetic contribution to the trait; fixed effects of other confounding covariates are also estimated. This first step enables separation of the genetic effect from other confounding effects for each subject and for each longitudinal trait. Then in the second step, we perform a simultaneous association test on multiple estimated random effects arising from multiple longitudinal traits. The proposed method can efficiently detect pleiotropic effects on multiple longitudinal traits and can flexibly handle traits of different data types such as quantitative, binary, or count data. We apply this method to analyze the 16th Genetic Analysis Workshop (GAW16) Framingham Heart Study (FHS) data. A simulation study is also conducted to validate this 2-step method and evaluate its performance.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 2 5%
South Africa 1 2%
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 38 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 8 19%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 10%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 7 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 15 36%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 10%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 10%
Neuroscience 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 2%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 February 2015.
All research outputs
#13,414,292
of 22,768,097 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#3,242
of 11,758 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,956
of 259,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#56
of 115 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,768,097 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,758 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 115 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.