↓ Skip to main content

Detecting rare structural variation in evolving microbial populations from new sequence junctions using breseq

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (89th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
22 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
99 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Detecting rare structural variation in evolving microbial populations from new sequence junctions using breseq
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, January 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2014.00468
Pubmed ID
Authors

Daniel E. Deatherage, Charles C. Traverse, Lindsey N. Wolf, Jeffrey E. Barrick

Abstract

New mutations leading to structural variation (SV) in genomes-in the form of mobile element insertions, large deletions, gene duplications, and other chromosomal rearrangements-can play a key role in microbial evolution. Yet, SV is considerably more difficult to predict from short-read genome resequencing data than single-nucleotide substitutions and indels (SN), so it is not yet routinely identified in studies that profile population-level genetic diversity over time in evolution experiments. We implemented an algorithm for detecting polymorphic SV as part of the breseq computational pipeline. This procedure examines split-read alignments, in which the two ends of a single sequencing read match disjoint locations in the reference genome, in order to detect structural variants and estimate their frequencies within a sample. We tested our algorithm using simulated Escherichia coli data and then applied it to 500- and 1000-generation population samples from the Lenski E. coli long-term evolution experiment (LTEE). Knowledge of genes that are targets of selection in the LTEE and mutations present in previously analyzed clonal isolates allowed us to evaluate the accuracy of our procedure. Overall, SV accounted for ~25% of the genetic diversity found in these samples. By profiling rare SV, we were able to identify many cases where alternative mutations in key genes transiently competed within a single population. We also found, unexpectedly, that mutations in two genes that rose to prominence at these early time points always went extinct in the long term. Because it is not limited by the base-calling error rate of the sequencing technology, our approach for identifying rare SV in whole-population samples may have a lower detection limit than similar predictions of SNs in these data sets. We anticipate that this functionality of breseq will be useful for providing a more complete picture of genome dynamics during evolution experiments with haploid microorganisms.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 4%
Spain 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 93 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 32 32%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 25%
Student > Bachelor 11 11%
Student > Master 7 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 4%
Other 15 15%
Unknown 5 5%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 43 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 8 8%
Computer Science 6 6%
Engineering 4 4%
Other 10 10%
Unknown 8 8%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#2,610,150
of 25,240,298 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#635
of 13,590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,931
of 363,506 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#15
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,240,298 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,590 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 363,506 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.