↓ Skip to main content

Regulators of homologous recombination repair as novel targets for cancer treatment

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (54th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
184 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Regulators of homologous recombination repair as novel targets for cancer treatment
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00096
Pubmed ID
Authors

Małgorzata Krajewska, Rudolf S. N. Fehrmann, Elisabeth G. E. de Vries, Marcel A. T. M. van Vugt

Abstract

To cope with DNA damage, cells possess a complex signaling network called the 'DNA damage response', which coordinates cell cycle control with DNA repair. The importance of this network is underscored by the cancer predisposition that frequently goes along with hereditary mutations in DNA repair genes. One especially important DNA repair pathway in this respect is homologous recombination (HR) repair. Defects in HR repair are observed in various cancers, including hereditary breast, and ovarian cancer. Intriguingly, tumor cells with defective HR repair show increased sensitivity to chemotherapeutic reagents, including platinum-containing agents. These observations suggest that HR-proficient tumor cells might be sensitized to chemotherapeutics if HR repair could be therapeutically inactivated. HR repair is an extensively regulated process, which depends strongly on the activity of various other pathways, including cell cycle pathways, protein-control pathways, and growth factor-activated receptor signaling pathways. In this review, we discuss how the mechanistic wiring of HR is controlled by cell-intrinsic or extracellular pathways. Furthermore, we have performed a meta-analysis on available genome-wide RNA interference studies to identify additional pathways that control HR repair. Finally, we discuss how these HR-regulatory pathways may provide therapeutic targets in the context of radio/chemosensitization.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 184 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 182 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 39 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 20%
Researcher 30 16%
Student > Bachelor 16 9%
Other 8 4%
Other 21 11%
Unknown 33 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 69 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 46 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 10%
Neuroscience 4 2%
Chemistry 3 2%
Other 8 4%
Unknown 35 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2015.
All research outputs
#12,726,260
of 22,796,179 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#2,568
of 11,761 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#117,131
of 262,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#74
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,796,179 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,761 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.