↓ Skip to main content

The rule of declining adaptability in microbial evolution experiments

Overview of attention for article published in Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (95th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
5 news outlets
twitter
10 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Citations

dimensions_citation
100 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
92 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The rule of declining adaptability in microbial evolution experiments
Published in
Frontiers in Genetics, March 2015
DOI 10.3389/fgene.2015.00099
Pubmed ID
Authors

Alejandro Couce, Olivier A. Tenaillon

Abstract

One of the most recurrent observations after two decades of microbial evolution experiments regards the dynamics of fitness change. In a given environment, low-fitness genotypes are recurrently observed to adapt faster than their more fit counterparts. Since adaptation is the main macroscopic outcome of Darwinian evolution, studying its patterns of change could potentially provide insight into key issues of evolutionary theory, from fixation dynamics to the genetic architecture of organisms. Here, we re-analyze several published datasets from experimental evolution with microbes and show that, despite large differences in the origin of the data, a pattern of inverse dependence of adaptability with fitness clearly emerges. In quantitative terms, it is remarkable to observe little if any degree of idiosyncrasy across systems as diverse as virus, bacteria and yeast. The universality of this phenomenon suggests that its emergence might be understood from general principles, giving rise to the exciting prospect that evolution might be statistically predictable at the macroscopic level. We discuss these possibilities in the light of the various theories of adaptation that have been proposed and delineate future directions of research.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 92 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Belgium 2 2%
Spain 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 87 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 30 33%
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Master 17 18%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Student > Postgraduate 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 7 8%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 34 37%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 30%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 4%
Physics and Astronomy 3 3%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Other 8 9%
Unknown 12 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 47. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 September 2023.
All research outputs
#895,412
of 25,576,801 outputs
Outputs from Frontiers in Genetics
#138
of 13,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#11,078
of 275,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Frontiers in Genetics
#5
of 156 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,576,801 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 13,762 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,047 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 156 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.